Where are the Windmills: Cape Cod and American Exceptionalism, Historically

Dr. Edward Hitchcock, influenced by studies of Agassis and Lyell, concluded in an essay on Historical Geography that Cape Cod was in geological terms the “terminal moraine” of a glacier that once occupied Cape Cod Bay.

Ref. Geographical Review. July 1920 ColgateUniversity.

 

Pilgrims arrived on the MayflowerIn March 1621, when the Mayflower arrived in Plymouth transporting English Puritans seeking religious freedom and separatists, there were a total of 102 passengers and a crew of 25-30. After a harrowing 66-day voyage that included a disease that took the lives of two passengers, the Mayflower first dropped anchor inside the hook-tip of Provincetown harbor.

 

Clearly off course – their original destination was Virginia– they thought they had arrived at the mouth of the Hudson River. Passengers endured the winter of 1620-21 anchored off of Provincetown, from November 1620 to March 1621.

 

The survivors of that difficult winter established the Plymouth Colony under the strong leadership of William Bradford, one of only five crew members whose names are known today; John Alden being another.

 

From that time on, the settlements in Cape Cod gradually increased until around 1672 when the Old Colony industries, previously sparse agriculture due to the sandy moraine soil, of fishing and whaling began the upsurge in the economy of the area. Even grist mills and other mills and minor manufacturing continued to grow. Ultimately, Boston became a major seaport and shipbuilding area.

 

From the early days of the Pilgrim’s settlement, only chronicled by William Bradford, it was tantalizingly apparent that the abundant fish in the sea represented an opportunity for unlimited wealth for the industrious.

A vigorous seafaring industry blossomed from that promise, and the American Dream in the new world had its foundation in Massachusetts.

The resulting ecology and culture shaped the landscape of the glacial moraine known as Cape Cod, even to its architecture.

 

With running rivers a scarce commodity on Cape Cod, the exceptional Americans demonstrated their ingenuity by harvesting the wind. Windmills dotted the landscape powering local mills.

 

Widow's Walk

The women of the seafarers in merchant or fishing ships led weeks of anxious isolation. Alone waiting for their man to return, they paced back and forth on rooftop decks called “widow’s walks.” Here on a small 8 x 10 railed space they would wait often pacing, awaiting a glimpse of a returning ship that carried their loved one. They walked hoping their beloved sailor was coming home.

 

In more recent applications of American ingenuity on Cape Codit is not uncommon to see solar hot water heaters mounted on rooftops, or even solar panels on middle-class homes attempting to defray the energy costs.

 

Modern widow’s walks are still built in sharp contrast to the reasons established in the colonial days and the peak of the seafaring days of Massachusetts. These modern widows’ walks, approved by strict guidelines of historical real estate committees, are used for the summer pilgrims to catch a glimpse of the sea during cocktail hour.

 

Windmills of Cape CodWhat are missing from the modern landscape in Cape Cod are the windmills, which are so desperately needed for the production of electric energy. They are missing because a few rich, local politicians are “fighting to protect the environment.”

 

The question is from what? Wind? Or hot air?

 

Theodore Morrison Homa MD

Time Capsule to the Sacred: Simple solution to the separation of church and state

Sunday morning, April 15, 2012 was my first Sunday on Cape Cod since mid-September 2011. The newspaper headlines from the Cape Cod commemorated the Titanic 100 years later with an interview with Robert Ballard, the oceanographer from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution who discovered the wreckage in 1985.

He was quoted by Sean Teehan that his “only concern was coming in contact with the ship.” It seems Ballard was mindful of the 25 remaining survivors in 1985 and the sanctity of the seawater grave that marked the final resting place of the 1500 souls lost in the fatal descent to the bottom of the sea. In fact, the article was titled Time capsule or Sacred Ground?

Lost in reverie about the history of the Titanic on this sunny, Sunday morning, I looked for distraction through the historical roots of important things I would encounter this very day. My usual Cape Cod Sunday starts with 8 a.m. Mass at Sacred Heart Church, an extension of St. Francis Xavier Parish. The main church on South St. in Hyannis was made famous because it was the church were President John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy were parishioners along with Jack’s mother Rose.

Jane Byrne DedicationThe dedication of the Sacred Heart Church is in a granite slab framed into the wall to the left of the main altar. The inscription reads: “In Memory of Jane Byrne 1826-19111, In Whose Life the Love of God was Manifest,***** By her Devotion This Church Was Built. 1899.”

I had seen it many times before, but this morning seemed to be devoted to history and sacred places. I must confess I knew nothing about Jane Byrne or why this Church was built in her memory 113 years ago.

After a day of searching I found a neighbor who had some knowledge about this simple woman. The story states she was an Irish immigrant who came to Cape Cod and worked as a domestic for a Protestant family. She served her employer so well and was so devout that they donated the money to build the church and had it dedicated to her. There apparently was no archive of the Cape Cod Times then that chronicled her life.

My research left me with a thirst for some more knowledge about sacred things, including religious influence on Cape Cod history. Reveries again took me to the steps of Carleton Hall when I was 16, summering in Cape Cod. It was the tradition of various churches to reach out to the summer crowds and hold religious services in buildings near the tourists. Carleton Hall was one of those places where Catholic Mass was available in a non-traditional church.

Carleton HallOn that warm, Sunday morning in August, crowds were large. And I stood with my family attending Mass on the steps just outside of Carleton Hall. My little sister in her terrible twos was making a fuss when a tall familiar Irish-looking man picked her up and held her on his shoulders so she could see over everyones’ heads. Katie immediately quieted down while she rode piggyback on Ted Kennedy’s shoulders.

Today, I thought that somehow the landmark meeting hall, owned by the town of Dennis, would not be able to serve a dual purpose because of separation of church and state principles and the ACLU. I looked deeper into the history of Carleton Hall, which was originally established sometime in the 1820’s by Reformed Methodists, who as a group purchased the land from Oliver Crowell and built the meeting house.

Methodist Meeting Hall 1828Digging further, I was surprised to discover that up until 1821 the Town of Dennis paid the salary of a minister who served both North and South Dennis. As religious diversity increased the town required those who were not Methodists to register their religious group with the town hall and their portion of the tax bill that paid for the public minister was forgiven. There were 39 total members of religious groups other than the established church. In 1821, Massachusetts passed the Religious Freedom Act, which allowed this portion of the tax allotment not to be charged.

I marvel at the simplicity of the solution to the separation of church and state offered by the State of Massachusetts.  No involvement was required by the federal government. No attempt was made by any legal organization with anti-religious motives to suppress religious freedom. It was just a simple approach to the problem: If you are not of the same belief system then you don’t have to pay the tax.

Imagine today if you were Roman Catholic or Evangelical Christian. How friendly this approach would be to the issue of requiring people of faith to pay for services, such as abortion or contraception, they legitimately don’t believe in. Massachusetts is considered a traditionally liberal state by most people – yet they were fair and understanding of the sensitive issues of Religious Freedom.

Why is it that the current regime under Barrack Obama must be so totalitarian? The truth is in his actions.

 

 

 

 

When the Swallows come Home to Capistrano- by Robert Manniello

The following is a guest post written and supplied by my friend Robert Manniello, MD:

Click here to see a video about the San Juan Capistrano Swallows from www.missionsjc.com/.

 

Let’s pretend we’re one of the famed cliff swallows flying with our friends to SJC from Argentina, enduring a host of climate changes and potential adversaries along the way, eventually surviving the sometimes perilous 6,000-mile journey. 

 

Return of the swallows to San Juan CapistranoWhy would we choose to make our home in beautiful SJC? What real estate (nesting site) attractions and amenities would we look for in our intent to settle briefly and raise a family? Why would we choose to build nests in smaller or larger groups? Which would be the better choice? Would we likely return the following year? Is the SJC community doing anything to bring us back to the mission’s old stone church? 

 

Of course, we all know the invitation by Monsignor St. John O’Sullivan (Mission SJC’s “Great Restorer”) to the swallows in the 1920s assured a perpetual loving place to make their home when shopkeepers demonstrated continuing frustration over the aviary nuisance. But the swallows return to SJC in smaller and smaller numbers. Why? 

 

SJC SwallowsWell, the answers came as an unexpected gift during the recent St. Joseph’s Day celebration at the mission during an intriguing guest lecture from the cliff swallow’s point of view by Charles Brown, Ph.D., professor of behavioral ecology and ornithology at the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma.

 

Brown presented his team’s research in a relaxed, neighborly manner that was absorbed effortlessly by the packed Soldiers Barracks attendees of various ages. Mixing scientific methodology with humor in his storytelling and accompanying photos and graphs, he pointed out the birds’ social nature. They not only live in selected groups (condominium-style), constantly observing one another, but also communicate best meal sources (insect swarming areas). Working as a team, sharing parts of their gourd-shaped mud-pellet nests as prefabricated sides for their neighbors’ quarters, they help their commune. By this cooperative building effort, the birds cut nest construction periods from three weeks to three days, allowing other squadron members quality family time. 


Female swallows may deposit eggs in neighbors’ nests for proxy hatching beside their own condo unit. Male swallows, in the continuing spirit of the 1970s, scope out other potential mates. Their selection of nesting sites is similar to our human endeavors, selecting the right neighborhood and environs, usually a collective social decision after proper investigation.

Unfortunately, parasitic infections (swallow bugs) hinder not only settling but also progeny survival, with safety exhibited in smaller group nesting behavior. Return to reliable noninfested areas is a must for offspring and family survival. The danger: Swallow bugs lay dormant over the winter, expecting a blood feast with the return of the swallows. 

 

Changes in SJC ecology have diverted the cliff swallows away from the mission’s treasured stone church as a potential home. Urban expansion and landscape advancements in our beloved city appear to be a turnoff. To entice the swallows’ group decision-making in favor of returning home, one of the local initiatives to lure the missed, messy neighbors is to broadcast their bird calls. The purpose: to allow a “look-see” and hopefully a decision to come back to this ideal, secure location. 

 

© Copyright 2012 Freedom Communications. All Rights Reserved.
Robert Manniello MD
 

America and the Shibboleth of Exceptionalism

In the past 24 hours I met a fascinating gentleman on Twitter. He calls himself Brian McCabe. Brian’s Twitter profile states: “Blogs at Liberaloutpost in Republican North Jersey, pissed off political activist, OWS, secular humanist, lefty with an angry fastball. Cadwell, NJ. http://liberaloutpost.wordrxpress.com.”

So much for reproducing his public, presumably self-written profile. Three hours ago I believed he was communicating with me, and then I got this message:

“You love in a parallel universe.Without republican taking points sand fox news you are an empty suit. Bye!”

I am still trying to find out why he is so angry. One of his tweets to me: “Unless we are able to examine the root causes of our problems what chance do we have to fix them? None.” Another: “America isn’t perfect, as you say. For America to move forward realism must replace the shibboleth of exceptionalism.”

Not an unreasonable guy, perhaps with a myopic point of view. A shibboleth is defined as a popularly held belief that for some reason no longer applies. In America, exceptionalism  is still a popular belief. It seems that my angry liberal friend feels that it no longer applies. I would like to know why. What are his qualifications? Should we believe him? Does he know a different history than the rest of us have been taught? Is that enough to make one title themselves as a pissed off political activist and a lefty with an angry fastball?

Assume the anger is justified. Is it because of the corrupt politics that have plagued New Jersey for most of the last century?

I could be angry in New Jersey just because of their road system. Using those infernal jughandles to make a left turn would anger me. What about the Governor Jon Corzine, a democrat and the former CEO of Goldman Sachs and MF Global, currently being investigated over monitary irregularities in NJ while he was governor? He left Goldman sachs with a hefty $400 million on Nov 4, 2011. Some of his accomplishments as a democratic politician include moving the Senate to the left and spending the most ever on a Senate campaign ($62million). He, in the spirit of politicians of his ilk, refused to release his income tax return records to the public. Imagine a right-wing Republican getting away with that. He raised tuitiun at Rutgers and cut hundreds of programs there. Yes, I can see why my friend was angry. He even pushed for universal health care and same sex marriages, two extremely polarizing bills. It is no wonder that he was so unpopular.

Enough about the politics of New Jersey.What about the history of Atlantic City and the gambling and alcohol corruption there?

And who wants to be from New Jersey when the Giants, who play in the meadow lands, are called the NY giants not the NJ Giants. No, my friend Brian McCabe seems to have every right to be angry. Then, are not most people from the left always angry at something.?

I think he is angry at me because I forgave him for being angry.

Theodore Morrison Homa MD